Reply to Jahangiri and Clark

Authors' Reply: Response to Ian Clark

Jennifer Vines This is the fi rst of 12 Correspondence pieces in this issue that are in response to an important PLoS Medicine Research Article: Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, et al. (2005) Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: The ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med 2(11): e298. Readers wishing to add their own ...

Conceptual Representation of Pictures and Words: Reply to Clark

Clark (1987) offers a dual coding alternative (Paivio, 1971, 1986) to the conceptual hypothesis that Potter, Kroll, Yachzel, Carpenter, and Sherman (1986) proposed to explain the ease with which people can read and understand rebus sentences in which a picture replaces a noun. We present theoretical and empirical reasons for positing a conceptual representation that is distinct from the represe...

To Clark . ii

In this thesis we study a formal first order system T in the standard language L, of Gentzen’s LK, see [Tak87]. T(tind) extends LK by the following valid first-order inference rule (A is quantifier-free). Γ,A(a), Λ→ ∆,A(s(a)), Θ Γ,A(0), Λ→ ∆,A(sn(0)), Θ (tind) This rule is called term induction, it derives a restricted term built from successor s and the constant 0. We call such terms numerals....

Special Section IN WHAT SENSE ARE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT INDEPENDENT? A Reply to Tellegen, Watson, and Clark

304 Copyright © 1999 American Psychological Society VOL. 10, NO. 4, JULY 1999 Abstract—We agree with most of the claims made by Tellegen, Watson, and Clark: Pleasant and unpleasant affect (i.e., happiness and unhappiness) are strongly negatively correlated; random and nonrandom error need to be taken into account before interpreting correlations among affect scales; scales of positive affect (P...

The Authors’ Reply